Watching my son playing, it strikes me that the differences between his outlook on life and mine are worlds apart. He demands, he takes, he lives each moment without concept of consequence. He is unapologetically selfish - and I don't mind a bit. But I wonder at what point he will become aware, as many of the rest of us are, that imposing nothing but our own wants on those around us is something of a drain.
Of course, there are those among us who never realise this. Those who seem totally indifferent to the fact that other people exist just as fully and consequentially as they do, that others have wants and needs as well as them. Those who perhaps somehow believe that everyone else in the world was put there just for their amusement and employ. Of course, I speak of no-one in particular.
There are people who believe the world owes them a living. There are people who want to be like this but just can't quite cut it. And there are those who live for everyone else. How does this happen? Is it inbuilt, or is it social conditioning, instilled in us by our families from an early age. Is the eldest in a family more likely to take, whilst the youngest is raised to share and give? Perhaps it is more complicated than that.
Selfishness is a funny thing. We are all selfish to some extent - that episode of Friends where Joey tells Phoebe that there is no such thing as an unselfish act is surprisingly spot on. Whether it be for personal happiness, professional advance, or even just to assuage our own Catholic sense of guilt - he's right. Or at least, it's very hard to think of one.
Personally I find selfishness easier to take in others if they so it unself-consciously. Yet it annoys me more than anything when people use it as a self-contained excuse. "Sorry, I was being selfish." That is not an excuse, it's a description. I maintain - we are all selfish, it's just that some of us are more ready to yielf to the selfishness of others. But why? To satisfy our own sense of martyrdom? I am guilty of that to some extent - of course, there is a practical level at which I know certain chores need to get done, but I am useless at asking for help - perhaps because I would rather have the satisfaction afterwards of having done it all alone. Being hard done by. It's a luxury of those who have never really been hard done-by - a bit like rich people saying money doesn't buy happiness. I'm not saying it's the answer to everything - but it makes the process of figuring out what is a damn sight easier.
So I joined this writing course, and from it, a splinter writers' group. And lo and behold, what do I find, within just a few short months. Everyone is posting their assignments merrily every couple of weeks - but for the last 4, only 1 other person has bothered to feed back on mine. I, of course, have fed back on everyone else's each time, however laborious that can feel. Which is does to some extent because let's face it, we are all in it for ourselves. Some of them provide very good reading and are a pleasure to work on - others feel like homework. But why is it that these other people feel no guilt in just taking all the feedback and giving none back? We are all there for the same reasons.
Of course this is just a small, petty example. And perhaps labelling everything others do in their own interests as selfishness is too pejorative. After all, we can't help being the centre of our own universes - I suppose it stems from the fact that, from the moment we are born, most of us are lucky enough to suddenly become the centre of someone else's. It stands to reason that rubs off; just a little.
Tuesday, 30 March 2010
Sunday, 28 March 2010
Once in a while...
... there comes along a show that seems to capture the imagination of the nation. Recently, these shows seems to have orbited around celebrity, reality, and various (increasingly ridiculous) different takes upon those two things.
But sometimes, a more intelligent show comes along and just enough celebrities endorse it enough for the common man to feel it's not uncool to say they watch it too. Wonders of the Solar System is such a show.
Twitter is all agog - any given night that it's on, a pretty high proportion of people I follow seem to be both online, and watching Wonders. They comment liberally, they praise - Professor Brian Cox has rocketed into the public eye and is single-handedly making intelligence - nay, physics - cool. OK, maybe not cool. But people want in on this.
Is it that celebrity endorsement has made us all watch in the first place, or that the endorsement makes us all more vocal about liking what we see? It's quite a strange feeling, knowing that across the country there are so many of us watching, mouths slightly open, thinking very similar thought.
A Twitterer I follow wrote this just now: Got to say though-how things actually are makes religion seem like a very mundane, quite silly, explanation for it all.
And that sums it all up rather beautifully. The world is capable of, and displays across the world in a million different ways, miracles far greater than the feeing of the 5000, or the parting of the oceans. The more I consider it, the more I am convinced religion is only there as a human construct to help others feel better about death. But then again - does it matter?
What I mean is, whether there is technically a "God" or not is almost irrelevant - if people believe, then it's there. I think therefore I am - it's basic philosophy, not religion. If God is nothing but an ideal by which people choose to live, a code of ethical or moral conduct - where's the harm? OK, I hear you shout, the harm is in the wars, the misinterpretation of religious text. And yes, of course, I am with you on that. But for the first time in my life I find myself thinking that perhaps God does exist - in the same way that I will one day have to accept that popular usage WILL make the meanings of infer and imply the same. I shall cry, but it won't stop it being true.
I may not believe in the big guy in the sky - but when I look at the things on shows like Wonders - I can't deny that God exists. Not that he created it - but that there is a part of all of us that created him to help explain what physics can do.
But sometimes, a more intelligent show comes along and just enough celebrities endorse it enough for the common man to feel it's not uncool to say they watch it too. Wonders of the Solar System is such a show.
Twitter is all agog - any given night that it's on, a pretty high proportion of people I follow seem to be both online, and watching Wonders. They comment liberally, they praise - Professor Brian Cox has rocketed into the public eye and is single-handedly making intelligence - nay, physics - cool. OK, maybe not cool. But people want in on this.
Is it that celebrity endorsement has made us all watch in the first place, or that the endorsement makes us all more vocal about liking what we see? It's quite a strange feeling, knowing that across the country there are so many of us watching, mouths slightly open, thinking very similar thought.
A Twitterer I follow wrote this just now: Got to say though-how things actually are makes religion seem like a very mundane, quite silly, explanation for it all.
And that sums it all up rather beautifully. The world is capable of, and displays across the world in a million different ways, miracles far greater than the feeing of the 5000, or the parting of the oceans. The more I consider it, the more I am convinced religion is only there as a human construct to help others feel better about death. But then again - does it matter?
What I mean is, whether there is technically a "God" or not is almost irrelevant - if people believe, then it's there. I think therefore I am - it's basic philosophy, not religion. If God is nothing but an ideal by which people choose to live, a code of ethical or moral conduct - where's the harm? OK, I hear you shout, the harm is in the wars, the misinterpretation of religious text. And yes, of course, I am with you on that. But for the first time in my life I find myself thinking that perhaps God does exist - in the same way that I will one day have to accept that popular usage WILL make the meanings of infer and imply the same. I shall cry, but it won't stop it being true.
I may not believe in the big guy in the sky - but when I look at the things on shows like Wonders - I can't deny that God exists. Not that he created it - but that there is a part of all of us that created him to help explain what physics can do.
Sunday, 21 March 2010
To blog or not to blog...
You see, the thing is, I get the impression that very few people are blogging for themselves. It seems to be that the vast majority are doing it in order to either publicise their writing abilities, or in some other way put themselves in the eye of many more beholders than they would normally reach. Whether this is because they just want to share, or whether secretly everyone is hoping to be "discovered" as the next major talent of the century, or sell their stories for a small (or ideally large) fortune.
And that's where I fall down. Because naturally I too want to be discovered as the next big talent, but I don't feel a blog is the best way for me to publicise myself. Certainly not this blog, and certainly not the way I am writing it at the moment. It's too personal in some ways, yet not personal enough. Like most of my writing, I feel that it's slightly wide of the mark.
The chances of me having sufficient talent and imagination to "make it" as a writer are slim. That doesn't stop me wanting to try, but I wonder whether it means I may have failed before I even start. If even I don't have that degree of self-belief, who on earth else is going to? And yet I keep plugging away at it, without much conviction, and yet reluctant to give up on that lifelong dream of being a writer. I wonder whether, at the heart of it, I just know I am not good enough. But there is a stubborn streak underlying it all, a single thread of titanium obstinance that wearily binds the disintegrating wisps of doubt together. Because, a bit like the maxm that in order to outrun a lion, one only needs to be faster than the person next to them, perhaps it will be enough not to necessarily be the best writer ever born (Lord knows I've drunk away too many brain cells for that) but perhaps just better than a lot of others will be OK. Because there is some terrible stuff out there - I know I can do better than some. The vision in my mind is sheer brilliance. Sadly its translation into black and white remains some way short of the ideal.
I need to remember how to think.
And that's where I fall down. Because naturally I too want to be discovered as the next big talent, but I don't feel a blog is the best way for me to publicise myself. Certainly not this blog, and certainly not the way I am writing it at the moment. It's too personal in some ways, yet not personal enough. Like most of my writing, I feel that it's slightly wide of the mark.
The chances of me having sufficient talent and imagination to "make it" as a writer are slim. That doesn't stop me wanting to try, but I wonder whether it means I may have failed before I even start. If even I don't have that degree of self-belief, who on earth else is going to? And yet I keep plugging away at it, without much conviction, and yet reluctant to give up on that lifelong dream of being a writer. I wonder whether, at the heart of it, I just know I am not good enough. But there is a stubborn streak underlying it all, a single thread of titanium obstinance that wearily binds the disintegrating wisps of doubt together. Because, a bit like the maxm that in order to outrun a lion, one only needs to be faster than the person next to them, perhaps it will be enough not to necessarily be the best writer ever born (Lord knows I've drunk away too many brain cells for that) but perhaps just better than a lot of others will be OK. Because there is some terrible stuff out there - I know I can do better than some. The vision in my mind is sheer brilliance. Sadly its translation into black and white remains some way short of the ideal.
I need to remember how to think.
Saturday, 6 March 2010
One more step
It's funny, the things your mind does to sabotage you. Perhaps there are people out there who truly believe they deserve good things, people who fully expect to win the lottery and actually do, and people who look themselves in the mirror's eye and believe they are good at whatever it is they say they do. I do not fall into this category.
I am delighted to report that I have had my first magazine acceptance. Pregnancy and Birth are allegedly going to publish my short article on bump names. Of course, I am still to await details, so they still have a couple of days to realise their mistake and decide that someone needs to be fired over the decision to publish my sorry little offering. But still. I liked it. My tutor liked it (whatever that's worth - I can't help feeling she's far too easy on me, going for the easy course pass rather than really challenging me as a writer) And yet, as soon as someone wants to publish it, I can't help wondering what the hell was wrong with it.
Having said that I am still happy about the news - I just don't quite believe it. And so I can't help but wonder... if this is how I feel about one simple article... I mean, I did study English at one of the best universities in the world, I really ought to be able to string a few sentences together - it's little wonder I haven't done anything big in life, is it?!
Nuff for now - supposed to be keeping this professional. Perhaps I'll go back to just doing little articles on here. It's not a diary, is it? Though I'm sure that's how it started...
I am delighted to report that I have had my first magazine acceptance. Pregnancy and Birth are allegedly going to publish my short article on bump names. Of course, I am still to await details, so they still have a couple of days to realise their mistake and decide that someone needs to be fired over the decision to publish my sorry little offering. But still. I liked it. My tutor liked it (whatever that's worth - I can't help feeling she's far too easy on me, going for the easy course pass rather than really challenging me as a writer) And yet, as soon as someone wants to publish it, I can't help wondering what the hell was wrong with it.
Having said that I am still happy about the news - I just don't quite believe it. And so I can't help but wonder... if this is how I feel about one simple article... I mean, I did study English at one of the best universities in the world, I really ought to be able to string a few sentences together - it's little wonder I haven't done anything big in life, is it?!
Nuff for now - supposed to be keeping this professional. Perhaps I'll go back to just doing little articles on here. It's not a diary, is it? Though I'm sure that's how it started...
Thursday, 25 February 2010
There's just no pleasing some people...
Sadly I refer to myself. Whilst usually an avid supporter of the "think positive, life is what you make it" school of thought, I do allow myself the occasional moment of self-indulgent griping. Actually I do quite a lot of griping, I just prefer to focus on the more positive bits.
So - why am I impossible to please? I have sold my first piece of writing, Snapdragons, a children's illustrated narrative verse story, to an online magazine. I have heard back from Sprouts editor that he liked my article and wants another to go with it. I have been sent a features list by an old contact in the DVD industry to write for him. And my response? Disappointment. There must clearly be something wrong with all these people if they want to publish what I have written. I think it's also because I didn't think these were the best things I'd ever written so it's a little sour that they are the ones that have succeeded.
Then again, there's a little piece of me leaping about in excitement - first step on the ladder and all that. I do get painfully jealous of the success of others though. Bad me.
So - why am I impossible to please? I have sold my first piece of writing, Snapdragons, a children's illustrated narrative verse story, to an online magazine. I have heard back from Sprouts editor that he liked my article and wants another to go with it. I have been sent a features list by an old contact in the DVD industry to write for him. And my response? Disappointment. There must clearly be something wrong with all these people if they want to publish what I have written. I think it's also because I didn't think these were the best things I'd ever written so it's a little sour that they are the ones that have succeeded.
Then again, there's a little piece of me leaping about in excitement - first step on the ladder and all that. I do get painfully jealous of the success of others though. Bad me.
Monday, 8 February 2010
Don't read this if you're religious
The more I think about it, the more religion strikes me as absolutely preposterous. I mean really. Most 7 year olds are aware that there is no such thing as Father Christmas, the easter bunny or the tooth fairy - but at least all those things have real manifestations in humanity. OK so 9 times out of 10 it's their parents, but at least real, tangible things result.
Laws are passed, wars are fought and millions upon millions of people die every year in the name of God (whichever name those people are choosing is, for the purposes of this rant, irrelevant) A being whose existence has no basis in fact whatsoever, whose representation through history is at best sketchy and for whom, conveniently, the lack of proof of existence is meant to be taken as a test of faith, proving even more that he exists. (He, she - again, it's irrelevant) It's just utter tosh.
I do not gainsay spirituality, and I do believe that the human soul / conscious mind has more to it than simple mechanics, that we are perhaps more than just a bunch of animals roaming the earth in search of food. But I also suspect that that belief is, in most people, born of an inability to comprehend the idea of Nothing. Death is scary scary scary, never seeing those you love again. The idea that you can go through all the crap we go through, with no point or "higher meaning". But isn't our own existence, evolution and experience exactly what we're here for? Is God just a construct to comfort those who have lost loved ones? Some kind of insurance policy against a life cut short? Even some kind of omiscient boogeyman with which to scare children into behaving themselves. People have joked in the past that much of the world's turbulent history could have been avoided had the Bible had another page at the beginning saying "this is a work of fiction."
I believe in morality, I lead a relatively ethical existence (certainly in terms of the 10 commandments.) So much of the bible is just extremist, racist, homophobic evangelism, encouraging awful acts of retribution on what nowadays would be considered relatively minor sins. We throw up our Western hands in horror at the idea of Arabic cultures engaging in practices like cutting off the hands of thieves, or punishing women who have been raped. And yet it's all there, in the bible. If God were real, what kind of role model is that? I would rather raise my son to believe in a world where that kind of teaching is a thing of the past. We are encouraged to move with the times in all other aspects of life - why not this one? A country plunging further into debt by the day spends £20 million on a visit from the Pope. HOW can it possibly cost that much? I would love to know how much religion costs the average tax payer in this country.
Science has proved so much. We know some things don't exist (sorry Nessie...) And yes, fine, there are still things about this world, and more about the universe, that we don't know and probably never will. I just very much doubt that God's existence is one of them.I am all for people being happy in their own skins and finding whatever understanding of life makes them feel necessary and worthwhile in it. I just can't help feeling it's something that should be left behind with puberty.
Laws are passed, wars are fought and millions upon millions of people die every year in the name of God (whichever name those people are choosing is, for the purposes of this rant, irrelevant) A being whose existence has no basis in fact whatsoever, whose representation through history is at best sketchy and for whom, conveniently, the lack of proof of existence is meant to be taken as a test of faith, proving even more that he exists. (He, she - again, it's irrelevant) It's just utter tosh.
I do not gainsay spirituality, and I do believe that the human soul / conscious mind has more to it than simple mechanics, that we are perhaps more than just a bunch of animals roaming the earth in search of food. But I also suspect that that belief is, in most people, born of an inability to comprehend the idea of Nothing. Death is scary scary scary, never seeing those you love again. The idea that you can go through all the crap we go through, with no point or "higher meaning". But isn't our own existence, evolution and experience exactly what we're here for? Is God just a construct to comfort those who have lost loved ones? Some kind of insurance policy against a life cut short? Even some kind of omiscient boogeyman with which to scare children into behaving themselves. People have joked in the past that much of the world's turbulent history could have been avoided had the Bible had another page at the beginning saying "this is a work of fiction."
I believe in morality, I lead a relatively ethical existence (certainly in terms of the 10 commandments.) So much of the bible is just extremist, racist, homophobic evangelism, encouraging awful acts of retribution on what nowadays would be considered relatively minor sins. We throw up our Western hands in horror at the idea of Arabic cultures engaging in practices like cutting off the hands of thieves, or punishing women who have been raped. And yet it's all there, in the bible. If God were real, what kind of role model is that? I would rather raise my son to believe in a world where that kind of teaching is a thing of the past. We are encouraged to move with the times in all other aspects of life - why not this one? A country plunging further into debt by the day spends £20 million on a visit from the Pope. HOW can it possibly cost that much? I would love to know how much religion costs the average tax payer in this country.
Science has proved so much. We know some things don't exist (sorry Nessie...) And yes, fine, there are still things about this world, and more about the universe, that we don't know and probably never will. I just very much doubt that God's existence is one of them.I am all for people being happy in their own skins and finding whatever understanding of life makes them feel necessary and worthwhile in it. I just can't help feeling it's something that should be left behind with puberty.
Saturday, 6 February 2010
Ponderments and Wonderings
Before I had my son, I had a Good Job. We’re not talking six figures and a Canary Wharf penthouse here, but it kept me in unlimited free DVDs and all the film premieres I could want. And I am a big fan of film, so this was a Good Thing. And yet, when my crumpled little beauty of a son arrived, I took everyone, myself included, by surprise, and decided not to go back to work.
I was proud of my decision, and I stand by it – I love being able to spend every day with him, watching him discover and experiment in his own ways. And yet. Every so often I have a feeling that maybe I am somehow letting the side down, that I should have at least tried it out, and perhaps I gave in too easily. I was in the extremely fortunate position of being able to choose not to go back to work, and although it was a difficult decision, it really didn’t take me too long to make up my mind.
A few months ago, I went to a university reunion (I know, more fool me really) I was persuaded to go along against my better judgement by my best friend, and decided to take it at face value – an opportunity to meet up with friends in London and be out sans fils for once. We dutifully mingled and sipped our drinks, and waited politely to be routinely questioned by our old tutors, who we hadn’t seen for 10 years or so. Second in line, I waited patiently for my friend Mark to give a full life and work history of his path to becoming a successful sound engineer in the computer game industry. Suitably impressed, my tutor turned to me. Confident that she was going to be similarly impressed by my own sojourn in the world of film marketing, and my recent efforts to finally become a writer, I began with the proud words: “Well I recently gave up my job to stay at home with my son.” Before I could wow her with detail of my budding literary career, or bore her with highlights from my previous one, she interrupted me. “Oh how lovely,” she said. “And Liz, how about you?” That was it. My moment was over. I had been unequivocally and summarily dismissed.
But why? Surely it’s not just my own hackles that rise at such behaviour. Female emancipation is, in my perhaps flawed understanding of it, all about women having the freedom to choose the lifestyle they want for themselves, without being pressured into it. Well I have chosen to be at home with my son: so why do I feel so guilty about it?
Women in today’s society can have it all, and God forbid we don’t try to have exactly that. If we’re not juggling 4000 things then we’re obviously not working hard enough. It seems like we are living in the shadow of some giant, unspoken judgement that looms over us all. We have a collective chip on our shoulders the size of Mount Rushmore, and quite honestly, we need to cut ourselves some slack. We say the words but do we believe them? “Being a stay at home mum is a full time job.” There, I said it. And yet, do I believe it?
Well, my son certainly fills up most of my time, but because he doesn’t pay me a salary, set me ridiculous targets and assess me on a quarterly basis, I find it hard to take him seriously as a boss. The very fact that I am writing this might suggest that I am not entirely comfortable with the sole role of “stay-at-home-mum” just yet. Since university I have been entirely, proudly self-sufficient, and why should I give that up? I’ve worked hard to save up enough to maintain some degree of financial independence even now, without a salary. Women have fought so hard to be taken seriously, to stand on our own well turned-out feet that it rankles to take on a role associated with a much bleaker time of inequality. Most of my friends say they’re jealous that I can be at home all the time and I don’t doubt that in some ways that is true, but we all make our choices based on our own situations, and I’m not sure many of them would really be too comfortable with it either.
So was my tutor really blanking me, dismissing my status as unimportant and unworthy of input? Probably. But the fact that it bothered me reflects only on me, not on her. She has her own issues, her own filters through which she sees the world, and I have mine. Having children really does change your life, your perspective, and everything else. I for one am grateful that I have the opportunity to spend the first years of my son’s life with him, and I know that thousands of women out there will be envious that I can do just that. Maybe it’s just that the expectations we lay on each other and even on ourselves are so high that simply being one thing in life seems too simple to be truly rewarding. As most mothers will say, becoming one is the most empowering, memorable and unique moment in their lives – it seems that being able to focus on it for longer than your average maternity leave just seems too good to be true. But the time will come around all too soon when my son wants his own space and freedom, just as I need mine from time to time, and then I will look back on these precious years with longing and fond nostalgia.
It was actually my old boss who put my mind at rest. He knew I was struggling with my decision – as Free so memorably questioned, should I stay or should I go? He said, “Listen. If you leave, and decide in 6 months time it was the wrong decision, you can always go out and get another job. But if you stay and realise in 6 months it was the wrong decision, you can’t ever get that time back.”
Being a parent is a biological function, one that many will argue is the mythical Number 42 of life. Other people have their own raison d’etres; for some it is a career, travel or another passion. Many women decide not to have children at all, and are fulfilled in so many other ways. As long as we are comfortable with our own choices and understand the big things in life that makes each one of us happy, maybe just one identity is enough. Just because we CAN have it all these days, doesn’t necessarily mean that we always should.
I was proud of my decision, and I stand by it – I love being able to spend every day with him, watching him discover and experiment in his own ways. And yet. Every so often I have a feeling that maybe I am somehow letting the side down, that I should have at least tried it out, and perhaps I gave in too easily. I was in the extremely fortunate position of being able to choose not to go back to work, and although it was a difficult decision, it really didn’t take me too long to make up my mind.
A few months ago, I went to a university reunion (I know, more fool me really) I was persuaded to go along against my better judgement by my best friend, and decided to take it at face value – an opportunity to meet up with friends in London and be out sans fils for once. We dutifully mingled and sipped our drinks, and waited politely to be routinely questioned by our old tutors, who we hadn’t seen for 10 years or so. Second in line, I waited patiently for my friend Mark to give a full life and work history of his path to becoming a successful sound engineer in the computer game industry. Suitably impressed, my tutor turned to me. Confident that she was going to be similarly impressed by my own sojourn in the world of film marketing, and my recent efforts to finally become a writer, I began with the proud words: “Well I recently gave up my job to stay at home with my son.” Before I could wow her with detail of my budding literary career, or bore her with highlights from my previous one, she interrupted me. “Oh how lovely,” she said. “And Liz, how about you?” That was it. My moment was over. I had been unequivocally and summarily dismissed.
But why? Surely it’s not just my own hackles that rise at such behaviour. Female emancipation is, in my perhaps flawed understanding of it, all about women having the freedom to choose the lifestyle they want for themselves, without being pressured into it. Well I have chosen to be at home with my son: so why do I feel so guilty about it?
Women in today’s society can have it all, and God forbid we don’t try to have exactly that. If we’re not juggling 4000 things then we’re obviously not working hard enough. It seems like we are living in the shadow of some giant, unspoken judgement that looms over us all. We have a collective chip on our shoulders the size of Mount Rushmore, and quite honestly, we need to cut ourselves some slack. We say the words but do we believe them? “Being a stay at home mum is a full time job.” There, I said it. And yet, do I believe it?
Well, my son certainly fills up most of my time, but because he doesn’t pay me a salary, set me ridiculous targets and assess me on a quarterly basis, I find it hard to take him seriously as a boss. The very fact that I am writing this might suggest that I am not entirely comfortable with the sole role of “stay-at-home-mum” just yet. Since university I have been entirely, proudly self-sufficient, and why should I give that up? I’ve worked hard to save up enough to maintain some degree of financial independence even now, without a salary. Women have fought so hard to be taken seriously, to stand on our own well turned-out feet that it rankles to take on a role associated with a much bleaker time of inequality. Most of my friends say they’re jealous that I can be at home all the time and I don’t doubt that in some ways that is true, but we all make our choices based on our own situations, and I’m not sure many of them would really be too comfortable with it either.
So was my tutor really blanking me, dismissing my status as unimportant and unworthy of input? Probably. But the fact that it bothered me reflects only on me, not on her. She has her own issues, her own filters through which she sees the world, and I have mine. Having children really does change your life, your perspective, and everything else. I for one am grateful that I have the opportunity to spend the first years of my son’s life with him, and I know that thousands of women out there will be envious that I can do just that. Maybe it’s just that the expectations we lay on each other and even on ourselves are so high that simply being one thing in life seems too simple to be truly rewarding. As most mothers will say, becoming one is the most empowering, memorable and unique moment in their lives – it seems that being able to focus on it for longer than your average maternity leave just seems too good to be true. But the time will come around all too soon when my son wants his own space and freedom, just as I need mine from time to time, and then I will look back on these precious years with longing and fond nostalgia.
It was actually my old boss who put my mind at rest. He knew I was struggling with my decision – as Free so memorably questioned, should I stay or should I go? He said, “Listen. If you leave, and decide in 6 months time it was the wrong decision, you can always go out and get another job. But if you stay and realise in 6 months it was the wrong decision, you can’t ever get that time back.”
Being a parent is a biological function, one that many will argue is the mythical Number 42 of life. Other people have their own raison d’etres; for some it is a career, travel or another passion. Many women decide not to have children at all, and are fulfilled in so many other ways. As long as we are comfortable with our own choices and understand the big things in life that makes each one of us happy, maybe just one identity is enough. Just because we CAN have it all these days, doesn’t necessarily mean that we always should.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)